How Important Is Music In Worship?

Posted on

How important is music in worship…?

What is, and is not, allowable?

With a large contingency, if not a majority, of evangelical churches turning to Contemporary Christian Music (CCM) in worship services, I cannot help but ask these questions. It appears that the reply given by many CCM proponents, to challenges to such within worship, would be that the music (itself) is neutral. And all styles can be sanctified and utilized to the… Glory of God.

In all honesty, I myself believed this at one time. However, I began to ponder this and began to think, that to take this position would be to isolate this thing (music) which is created by fallen sinful human beings, and naively declare it untouched by the curse that came upon all creation. Can we really say music is neutral, and original sin has not touched it at all? Not merely the lyrics that the music is set to… but the music itself? Is it not possible that there are certain genres of music that are inherently worldly and profane (profane meaning common and unholy)? To call music “neutral” would appear to take a Pelagian view, in which the devastating and total effects of original sin, touching upon every aspect of man’s being is to be denied.

Should we be taking a genre of music (Rock/Pop/Rap), which originated and is still associated with rebellion, and introduce it into the worship service? Thinking God will surely accept it because we have sanitized, baptized, and sanctified it?
If we take this idea of music is neutral and it can all be used in worship, how consistent can we be? I present the following for your consideration and would ask if this would be acceptable next Sunday in worship?

Food for thought…

The Wrath of God

Posted on

An excellent video utilizing the words of a powerful preacher of the gospel…

Hilarious…

Posted on

I found this and decided I had to post it on the blog. It’s great…

It’s from the Youtube site “TheLutheranSatire“.

What Is Baptist Covenant Theology… Or 1689 Federalism?

Posted on

Below are five videos that serve as an introduction to 1689 Federalism, from the 1689 Federalism website.

Baptist History and Covenant Theology

Posted on

1689-confession-300x226

Below is a link to some excellent audio’s in regards to Baptist history and Baptist covenant theology, given by Dr. James Renihan.

http://www.1689federalism.com/baptists-rooted-in-covenant-grace/

Judging and Judgement

Posted on

39 Now as the king passed by, he cried out to the king and said, “Your servant went out into the midst of the battle; and there, a man came over and brought a man to me, and said, ‘Guard this man; if by any means he is missing, your life shall be for his life, or else you shall pay a talent of silver.’ 40 While your servant was busy here and there, he was gone.” Then the king of Israel said to him, “So shall your judgment be; you yourself have decided it.” 41 And he hastened to take the bandage away from his eyes; and the king of Israel recognized him as one of the prophets. 42 Then he said to him, “Thus says the LORD: ‘Because you have let slip out of your hand a man whom I appointed to utter destruction, therefore your life shall go for his life, and your people for his people.’ ” 43 So the king of Israel went to his house sullen and displeased, and came to Samaria. (1 Kings 20:39-43, NKJV)

In my continued reading of 1 Kings, I again came across something that struck me. In the above verses, it is revealed that Ahab (King of the Northern Kingdom of Israel) unwittingly made pronouncement of his own demise.
Even though he had just won a battle against the rival king of Syria, by the hand of God, he displays just how twisted his heart truly is. Ahab is merciful toward the pagan king who had sought his destruction, yet he is indifferent and unmerciful toward this servant (prophet) who had fought for Ahab, himself.
After reading this passage, I immediately was reminded of Matthew chapter 7:

1 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3 And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? (Matthew 7:1-3, NKJV)

As well as…

37 For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned. (Matthew 12:37, NKJV)

The verses just before this one, the Lord Jesus gives us the reason this is so,

33 “Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or else make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for a tree is known by its fruit. 34 Brood of vipers! How can you, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. 35 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. (Matthew 12:33-35, NKJV)

I believe it serves to show the condition of Ahab’s heart. Verse 43 of 1 Kings chapter 20 says “So the king of Israel went to his house sullen and displeased, and came to Samaria.” It shows that Ahab had no sorrow or repentance within his heart, but only contempt for God.

Is Matthew 7:1-3 meant to keep Christians from reproving, rebuking, and discerning each others sinful actions? I do not believe this is the intent. After all, in verse 33 the Lord does say “a tree is known by its fruit”. Also, Paul in 1 Corinthians chapter 5 urges the church to exercise church discipline in a certain matter. In order to do the same, individuals of the church would be required to engage in discernment, reproof, and rebuke of the guilty party.

So what could be the meaning of this…?

I believe, that when we are placed into such a situation we must remain humble and merciful, with Christ always in mind. That we must reflect upon and examine ourselves, to be sure we are not guilty of the same, or even worse sin. That we must seek to correct our brothers and sisters, in a spirit of love, grace, and restoration. And not seek to condemn, out of a spirit that inherently looks to elevate oneself at the expense of another. For if we do engage in such judging, then we should truly fear God. For if that is the measure one uses… How will one fare when that measure is taken from out of your hand, by He who is perfect, and applied to you?

Soli Deo Gloria

Idolatry Transcends Worshipping Carved Images

Posted on

In reading 1 Kings chapter 18 tonight, verse 21 really stuck with me… so I did a study. Does anyone see the common thread that I saw?

And Elijah came to all the people, and said, “How long will you falter between two opinions? If the LORD is God, follow Him; but if Baal, follow him.” But the people answered him not a word. (1 Kings 18:21, NKJV)

And if it seems evil to you to serve the LORD, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD. (Joshua 24:15, NKJV)

So these nations feared the LORD, yet served their carved images; also their children and their children’s children have continued doing as their fathers did, even to this day. (2 Kings 17:41, NKJV)

No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon. (Matthew 6:24, NKJV)

Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world —the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—is not of the Father but is of the world. And the world is passing away, and the lust of it; but he who does the will of God abides forever. (1 John 2:15-17, NKJV)

…The world draws the heart from God; and the more the love of the world prevails, the more the love of God decays. The things of the world are classed according to the three ruling inclinations of depraved nature.
     1. The lust of the flesh, of the body: wrong desires of the heart, the appetite of indulging all things that excite and inflame sensual pleasures.
     2. The lust of the eyes: the eyes are delighted with riches and rich possessions; this is the lust of covetousness.
     3. The pride of life: a vain man craves the grandeur and pomp of a vain-glorious life; this includes thirst after honour and applause.

…Many have tried to show how far we may be carnally-minded, and love the world; but the plain meaning of these verses cannot easily be mistaken. Unless this victory over the world is begun in the heart, a man has no root in himself, but will fall away, or at most remain an unfruitful professor. Yet these vanities are so alluring to the corruption in our hearts, that without constant watching and prayer, we cannot escape the world, or obtain victory over the god and prince of it.

~ Excerpts from Matthew Henry’s Commentary (Concise) Notes 1 John 2:15-17

Osteenism…

Posted on

image

Andy Stanley: Even if you don’t believe that Jesus is the Son of God, you will have a better life by following his teachings

Andy Stanley: Even if you don’t believe that Jesus is the Son of God, you will have a better life by following his teachings

Polemics Report

Editors Note. This article was originally written and posted at Jeff Maples Blog and is being reprinted here with permission.


Remember the old days where churches had steeples and stained glass windows? Remember when there were pews and a choir that sang edifying hymns to our Lord? Remember those days when people wore suits and ties and ladies wore dresses and heels trying to present their best to our God? Remember those days when children used to go to Sunday School classes and learn the Bible and families went to service and the pastor preached a sermon? “Well,” says Andy Stanley, “the greatest thing about all of this, is we don’t have to do that anymore,” he proclaims in his latest sermon series, “Brand New.”

Stanley is making it abundantly clear that he has no qualms about changes that are being made in today’s churches, and he’s proud of it.

View original post 405 more words

A Treatise of Self-Denial

I am currently reading an incredibly challenging and fruitful book by the Puritan, Thomas Manton.

A Treatise of Self-Denial

image

Even though this book was written in the seventeenth century, it will still cause the disciples of Christ to take a true introspective look at themselves.

It is available in pdf format from Chapel library… Here.